Subject: Re: Revised Retail SPA Dwgs&Amended BOMBA Plan
From: "Janice" <[email-masked]>
To: "Jit Ping" <[email-masked]>, "Phooi Fong" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "CKTan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:20 +0800

Dear Ping, 

No further comments on the revised SPA drawings, please courier the round stamped copy to client. As for the amended BOMBA Plans, the comments as follows:

·       Grid lines not tally and updates, it shall be same from site plan to tower. Please update the grid lines which emailed you yesterday

·       Refuse chamber room – walls shall be 2 hours fire rated and the door is 1 hour fire rated. 

·       No smoke detector inside the fire lift lobby, required 1 number at the lift motor room only. 

·       Typical units Type A, B & C to be revised and updated as per attached. 

Dear PhooiFong, please follow up 

Append herewith the DRAFT cover letters as the following:

·       Submission letter to BOMBA to mr. Yew for signature

·       Amended BOMBA Plans to client – I have amended the letter for CK’s advice

·       Amended SPA drawings to client – I have amended the letter for CK’s advice

Do call me if there any concern.

Regards

Janice

From: Jit Ping 
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 6:57 PM
To: Janice 
Cc: CKTan 
Subject: Re: Amendment Retail 1-3

Dear Janice

Attached herewith the amended retail for L2 & L3 as per requested by client and also the pindaan Bomba drawing in PDF for you to view before we print. 

For the Bomba Drawing, typical unit layout labeled with specific space and room (eg. kitchen, bedroom1, master suite and others) compare to previous only with “STUDIO”. Due to this re-submission is to show the unit for resident use not for commercial use so decide to label it. 
To check and discuss with you, it is okay?

Besides, this SPA and re-submission Bomba are different with the current approval BP (MPSP/40/20-73/42 with date 17 Aug 2016). As we discuss, we need to write a letter to client to note them on this matter before we do the submission.

Thank you,
Regards,
Ping

From: Janice 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:09 PM
To: Jit Ping 
Cc: CKTan 
Subject: Re: Amendment Retail 1-3

Dear Ping, 
Review the changes with ms. ES Ooi and mr. KC Wong just now, the changes confirmed and proceed accordingly. They have no objection on the proposed room door location as long as the travel distance within the retails shops not more than 15m in compliance to by law 165. 

Please proceed with the amendment to level 2 and 3 SPA drawings and Amended BOMBA plans as requested by client. Please revert the revised SPA drawings and amended BOMBA plans by Friday (28/10/2016).  
Thanks and regards
Janice

From: Jit Ping 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:44 AM
To: Janice 
Cc: CKT
Subject: Amendment Retail 1-3

Dear Janice,

Kindly find the amended for Level 1-3 as per comment,

1.  Units with frontage set back - The set back is to increase from current 2.1m to 2.4m 

2.  Level 2 Retail 25 & 26 - To cancel the frontage set back

3.  Level 3 units with frontage set back - To cancel the frontage set back; for the units which have dead end.

The Level 3 frontage have been removed and added the compartment. The compartment door locate next to the toilet due to distance from the end of compartment to the toilet is much nearer and circulation more practical.

Please have a view and discussion before we further process.

Thank you,

Regards,

Ping