Subject: Re: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting
From: "Tan Kheng Hoong" <[email-masked]>
To: "Jit Ping" <[email-masked]>, "Rachel Lim" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Ee Sze Ooi" <[email-masked]>, "'Wong Keat Chin'" <[email-masked]>, "CK Tan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:27:46 +0800

Rachel & Wei Xing, 

Please find the attached drawings with amendment on toilets in type B. 
Type A will remain as the original design.

Regards,
Tan KH
(BH Yew Architect)

From: Tan Kheng Hoong 
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 3:09 PM
To: Jit Ping ; Rachel Lim ; [email-masked] ; [email-masked] 
Cc: Ee Sze Ooi ; 'Wong Keat Chin' ; CK Tan 
Subject: Re: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

Rachel & Wei Xing, 

Please find the attached drawings for the unit layout which just confirmed with Ms.Ooi. We will replace all the type D with Type C. 

Regards,
Tan KH
(BH Yew Architect)

From: Jit Ping 
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 2:01 PM
To: hoong 
Subject: Fw: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

From: Chang Wei Xing 
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 12:17 PM
To: Rachael 
Cc: [email-masked] ; [email-masked] ; Ooi Ee Sze ; Wong Keat Chin ; CKTan ; Cheong Yew Kee ; Adinya Ittasaqa Rosiyana ; Yuslizza 
Subject: RE: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

Dear Rachael

Please kindly see attached CAD file capturing clients comments dated 2016.04.19 (between 8.51 am to 8.54am).

We have revised:

1.       Unit type 1D

 

2.       Unit type 1B with the addition of NFA as per instruction.

 

The increase in NFA is 3.66 sqm/39.39 sqf per unit.

Overall increase = 39.39 x 4 units per lvl x 18 floors x 2 towers = 5, 673 sqf (to be verified by BHYew)

Would appreciate confirmation before we proceed to revise the elevations and sections.

As the update of the elevations and sections can be time consuming, do lets us know in advance/ soonest possible.

Thank you and we look forward to your confirmation.

Best Regards

Wei Xing

 

From: Chang Wei Xing 
Sent: Monday, 18 April, 2016 7:13 PM
To: 'Rachael'
Cc: [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; 'Ooi Ee Sze'; 'Wong Keat Chin'; 'CKTan'; Cheong Yew Kee; Adinya Ittasaqa Rosiyana; 'Yuslizza'
Subject: RE: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

Dear Rachael and Team/ All

Kindly see attached unit layout plan revised according to client’s comment.

We have also indicated and provided for 300mm hood for fenestration area which we deemed necessary /practical for incorporation at your discretion.

Please kindly assist to confirmation and we shall proceed to update the sections and elevations accordingly.

Thank you.

Best Regards

Wei Xing

 

 

From: Chang Wei Xing 
Sent: Monday, 18 April, 2016 2:03 PM
To: 'Rachael'
Cc: [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; 'Ooi Ee Sze'; 'Wong Keat Chin'; 'CKTan'; Cheong Yew Kee; Adinya Ittasaqa Rosiyana; 'Yuslizza'
Subject: RE: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

Resend with attachment.

From: Chang Wei Xing 
Sent: Monday, 18 April, 2016 1:57 PM
To: 'Rachael'
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Ooi Ee Sze; Wong Keat Chin; CKTan; Cheong Yew Kee; Adinya Ittasaqa Rosiyana; Yuslizza
Subject: Counter Proposal to revised unit layout as per 15.04.2016 Meeting

Dear Rachael

Kindly see attached layout plan.

We recommend the following:

1.       We have paired up each type 1c and type 1D to reduce unwanted kinked and to make elevations neater and manageable.

2.       We have combined the AC ledge for type 1C and keeping the NFA of that unit the same.

Do let us know if this layout has the green light before we proceed to revise the elevations and sections accordingly.

Thank you.

Best Regards

Wei Xing

<<<< Proposed

<<< Before

 

From: Rachael [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Monday, 18 April, 2016 12:01 PM
To: Chang Wei Xing; Cheong Yew Kee
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Ooi Ee Sze; Wong Keat Chin; CKTan
Subject: revise studio units

Dear Wx, 

We have amend the studio apartment layout as per PPPW email dated 15.04.16.  Please review the revise unit layout design (type C & D) if any. 

For the type C, it looks like we only required 1 AC ledge but since it may affect the elevation.  We will let CPG to review if 1 or 2 ac ledge required. 

Kindly review the pan and revert to us today. 

regards,

Rachael 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION: This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, delete this message and you should not disseminate, distribute or copy any information contained herein.